
THE CONTRIBUTION OF ROMANIA TO CLIMATE CHANGE – THE EFFECTS OF ACCOUNTING THE GHG EMISSIONS FROM LAND USE, LAND-USE CHANGE AND FORESTRY (LULUCF)
1 National Research and Development Institute for Cryogenics and Isotopic Technologies - ICSI Rm. Valcea, Uzinei Street no. 4, PO Box Râureni 7, 240050, Râmnicu Vâlcea, Romania
2 Constantin Brancoveanu University, Bulevardul Nicolae Bălcescu 39, 240177, Râmnicu Vâlcea, Romania
3 National Research and Development Institute for Forestry "Marin Drăcea" Calea Bucovinei, 73 bis, 725100, Câmpulung Moldovenesc, Romania
*Corresponding authors: Constantin Nechita, E-mail: nechitadendro@gmail.com, and Mihaela Iordache, E-mail: mihaela.iordache@icsi.ro
Received 14 January 2021; Received in revised form 26 February 2021; Accepted 14 March 2021; Available online 16 April 2021Abstract
This study aimed to analyze Romanian (RO) involvement in the LULUCF sector by considering the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) good practice guidance (GPG). Trends were assessed using the Mann-Kendall (MK) test for trend estimation to determine the total greenhouse gas (GHG) (GHGCO₂-eq.) emissions/ removals. The results emphasized the increasing average annual levels of emissions/removals in both the EU-28 and RO when the subperiods from 1990-2005 and 2005-2017 were analyzed. Kendall’s analysis of GHG removal showed a positive trend in Romanian GHG removals, and no trend was observed for the EU-28. In comparison, the emissions indicated an increasing trend for RO and a decreasing trend for the EU-28. The GHGCO₂-eq. generated by the LULUCF sector decreased to an average annual rate of 0.5% per year in the EU-28. In Romania, these emissions increased by approximately 0.2% per year on average. Between 1990 and 2017, the CO2 total absorption increased to 0.9% per year. The methane absorption also increased by 11.7% per year, and no significant increasing trend was observed for methane. The dynamics of GHGCO₂-eq. emissions/removals in RO and LULUCF sectors showed that settlement had decreased in wetlands, and settlement of other land areas had increased. Assessing GHG gas emissions is essential for allowing each sector to promote specific strategies, policies and action plans. This will improve the national-level monitoring of the LULUCF sector and make this information more accessible to decision makers by raising awareness of the Romanian position within the EU-28.
References
Including land use, land-use change, and forestry in future climate change, agreements: thinking outside the box
Environ. Sci. Policy 10, 283-294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2006.10.011
Distribution and cultivation intensity of agricultural peat and gyttja soils in Sweden and estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from cultivated peat soils
Geoderma 154, 173-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.11.035
Reforming the EU approach to LULUCF and the climate policy framework
Environ. Sci. Policy 40, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.03.004
Carbon accounting and the climate politics of forestry
Environ. Sci. Policy 14, 1062-1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.07.001
Agriculture and LULUCF in the 2030
https://doi.org/10.2834/818173
Impact of modelling choices on setting the reference levels for the EU forest carbon sinks: How do different assumptions affect the country-specific forest reference levels?
Carbon Balance Manag. 14, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-019-0125-9
Energy system impacts and policy implications of the European Intended Nationally Determined Contribution and low-carbon pathway to 2050
Energy Policy 100, 216-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.023
The rules for land use, land use change and forestry under the Kyoto Protocol-lessons learned for the future climate negotiations
Environ. Sci. Policy 10, 353-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2007.02.001
The role of forestry projects in the clean development mechanism
Environ. Sci. Policy 8, 87-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2005.01.001
Contribution of native forests to climate change mitigation – A common approach to carbon accounting that aligns results from environmental-economic accounting with rules for emissions reduction
Environ. Sci. Policy 93, 189- 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.11.001
Rank correlation methods
Climate financing needs in the land sector under the Paris Agreement: An assessment of developing country perspectives
Land use Policy 83, 256-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.007
Assessment of national greenhouse gas mitigation targets for 2030 through meta-analysis of bottom-up energy and emission scenarios: A case of Japan
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.093
Effects of different agricultural organic wastes on soil GHG emissions: During a 4- year field measurement in the North China Plain
Waste Manag. 81, 202-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.10.008
Analysis of LULUCF accounting rules after 2012
Adv. Clim. Chang. Res. 2, 178-186. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1248.2011.00178
Contribution of different sectors to developed countries' fulfillment of GHG emission reduction targets under the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol
Environ. Sci. Policy 61, 143-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.envsci.2016.04.009
Are national commitments to reducing emissions from forests effective? Lessons from Indonesia
Forest Policy and Economics, 108, 101968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101968
Investigation of carbon dixoide removal from different gases using mixed matrix membranes
16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference, Energy and clean technologies conference proceedings, sgem 2016, vol II, 443-450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2016B42
Development and validation of a chromatographic method for the determination of C1-C8 hydrocarbons, O2, N2 and CO2 in natural gas
Revista de Chimie 67 (11), 2141-2147
The post-carbon society: Rethinking the international governance of negative emissions
Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 44, 199-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.031
Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation implementation in northern Pakistan
Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 102, 316-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.02.027
A carbon accounting tool for complex and uncertain greenhouse gas emission life cycles
Environ. Model. Softw. 107, 158-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.06.005
Carbon prices and greenhouse gases abatement from agriculture, forestry and land use in Nepal
Glob. Environ. Chang. 43, 26-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.01.005
Options for including land use in a climate agreement post-2012: improving the Kyoto Protocol approach
Environ. Sci. Policy 10, 295-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2006.12.004
Uncertainties related to climate change and forest management with implications on climate regulation in Finland
Ecosyst. Serv. 33, 213-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.011
Energy-related GHG emission in agriculture of the European countries: An application of the Generalized Divisia Index
J. Clean. Prod. 164, 686-694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.010
A review of greenhouse gas emission profiles, dynamics, and climate change mitigation efforts across the key climate change players
J. Clean. Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.140
Keywords
Greenhouse gases, Land use, Land-use change, Forestry, Mitigation Climate change.
Tag search Greenhouse gases Land use Land-use change Forestry Mitigation Climate change

ARCHIVE

ISSN 1582-2575
Show more...